Archive for December, 2005

02nd Dec 2005

Bookslut all sorts of quoted on the SLG News blog

I love it when my worlds collide. I mean, I know that libraries have collections of graphic novels and single issue comics, and I know librarians out there read and love them. But commentary on the Slave Labor Graphics blog on a commentary of a publishing of an anniversary issue of Watchmen where Jessa Crispin is quoted is very, very cool:

Comics: Past and Future
[slg_news on lj 1 dec '05]

Up at Slate now is an article by Tom Shone about Watchmen, which is being reprinted as Absolute Watchmen for its 20th anniversary. The year 1986 was a banner one for the comic book industry; DC published not only Watchmen (by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons) but Frank Miller’s Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, two works that changed the expecations readers have of comic books when it comes tone and story.* The new model was "gritty" and "dark" (and supposedly "realistic"), and emotionally tortured and morally ambiguous characters gained a new popularity.

Like Jessa Cripsin at Bookslut, I am unimpressed with the final paragraph of Shone’s article:

But did the comic book have to "grow up"? The last time I looked, the only ones reading Ulysses and quoting Nietzsche were teenagers. No adult has time for aesthetic "difficulty" or "self-consciousness." Life is too short. Frankly, we’d much rather be watching The Incredibles.

Read the rest for complete context, and the somewhat interesting and entertaining comment discussion that follows (not to mention the note that the * above goes to…).

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

02nd Dec 2005

Adorable tech features from some of my favorite sites

I know some libraries are incorporating things like this into their catalogs and web sites. Still, I want to share some nifty tech things I’ve seen on the web that not only show how these technologies are making their way into mainstream use, but could maybe, possibly, be incorporated into a library, somehow. If you’ve got ideas, or if you’re doing stuff like this, let me know, I love to hear from you.

Target.com: You can get highlights from the weekly ads, which can be viewed on their site at http://weeklyad.target.com, before Sunday through an RSS feed.

FoodTV.com: Some recipes (like this Tyler Florence Chicken Noodle Soup recipe) now have an option to send the grocery list for the recipe to your SprintPCS phone via a cute little yellow and black button. (Dear Catalog Vendors: could you add a button to the “My Saved List” page that sends the titles with call numbers to a cell phone, so that patrons don’t hafta write them down? That would be nifty. Love, Andrea)

Livejournal.com: The new My LJ portal is quite nifty, consolidating many features (recent comments, friend entries, friend birthdays, recent updates from the system, a quick entry form) on one page. Members with pay accounts can do more, apparently.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

01st Dec 2005

Why librarians should read the December issue of Wired

So I was flipping through Wired when I got it in the mail at the end of November, realizing that there were a whole lot of nifty articles everyone should read. Not all of these are online right now, but for the ones that are, I included links. The page number of the article is also listed.

  • Start-ping: What’s the most overhyped tech trend right now? (pg 46)
    Why? Neat to know opinions of all-in-one devices, blogging, and keeping tech hype promises.
  • Start-Cheap Talk: Taking Aim at Skype (pg 46)
    Why? Interested in voice over IP (VoIP)? Heard a lot of Skype hype, and looking into the next gen of online messaging? This little diddy is an interesting 2 minute read. Then visit the Gizmo site to see what they mean about competition.
  • Start-the best: The 10 Best Dystopias (pg 50)
    Why? This just *screams* library display, perhaps especially in the YA department.
  • Start-jargon watch (pg 54)
    Why? “Mountweasel n. Fake words or names invented by a reference-book [sic] publisher to detect plagiarism of its electronic databases. …” Have you heard of this?
  • Start-nuh-uh!: War of the Words (pg 60)
    Why?“The topics Wikipedians never get tired of fighting over.” Mmmm, Wikipedia. Get some.
  • Play-screen: The CG Chronicles of Narnia (pg 76)
    Why? A nice snippet on the computer graphics for the fabulous movie of the book.
  • Play-print: Where everyone gets a book deal (pg 90)
    Why? I actually had a reference question about self publishing. It’s handy info to have.
  • The 2005 Geek Gift Guide (pg 127)
    Why? Your more technically-inclined patrons will really be digging this stuff for the holidays. Your not-so-technically inclined patrons might want to get more information about them, and you’ll look really good knowing the stuff in advance.
  • Reinventing 911 (pg 208)
    Why? It’s like meatspace social networking on steroids with a cause. Public information to help the masses. That’s kinda what we do, right? Yes, this is a bit more extreme, but it’s somewhere that libraries could take a role, if we could find it. Besides, the mapping stuff their doing is *wicked* cool.
  • Don’t Call It Spyware (pg 224)
    Why? Remember Gator, the stupid spyware program that would mysteriously install itself on your computer with some other little download you installed, then promptly make using your computer impossible? They’ve repackaged themselves, but the program pretty much remains the same. It’s an interesting article on the state of the spyware wars, and something to think about when it comes to advising patrons on authoritativeness online, including downloads from companies.
  • Who’s Afraid of Google? Who Isn’t? (pg 233)
    Why? Yes, the focus of this little article is on profitable business sectors, but I was somewhat worried to see libraries not mentioned. Is it a good thing, because we shouldnt’ be worried? Is it a bad thing, because we’re not being thought of? Is it just that Wired isn’t the type of mag to be concerned with libraries? Did the “Print” section of the article cover the library concerns (I don’t really think so)? I haven’t decided, but it’s worth thinking about.
  • Thinking Outside the Box Office (pg 256)
    Why? Nice discussion of digital copyright and piracy in a “practical” application (as opposed to reading about DRM and such as an intellectual argument).

And the awesome Intel Centrino ad on page 51 with Lucy Lu sitting on a librarian’s lap in a library. ;)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

01st Dec 2005

I learned to fix stuff

Through a creative reorganizing of the desk schedule, I was able to attend a NMRLS workshop on Basic Book Repair yesterday. I wanted to take this class while I was at Simmons, but the class fills up quickly (I think the archives concentrators get dibs, too), so I never got a chance to. Honestly, I’m glad I got to take it this way, because it was free, and way more fun.

Gregor Trinkaus-Randall, who is on staff at the Massachusetts Board of Library Commissioners, came in to teach the class (which was taught, lucky me, at Reading Public Library). After a quick tour of the University Products catalog and a brief overview of the bare minimum tools you need for a basic book repair kit (microspatula, bone folder, cork-backed straight edge, really sharp cutting edge, neutral pH glue, document tape), we dug right in.

Interesting things I learned about supplies include:

  • Apparently, Elmer’s glue is the work of the devil. It’s way too acidic for books, and can cause damage in the long run. Best to invest in a neutral pH adhesive.
  • You may think scotch tape is OK, but it’s not. Scotch tape dries over time, discolors, and the adhesives are also, like the devil glue, to acidic. Even for magazines, document tape is better (although, really, you could use the “magic tape” found in tech services in a pinch for magazines, though you shouldn’t use it on books at all, really.)
  • Microspatulas are the most adorable things ever. And they’re useful.
  • If you use clear covers on your books (the kind you use to cover the jackets), don’t use vinyl. Mylar or some polyacetate blend is best, since vinyl, over time, breaks down into bad things including hydrochloric acid, which is officially bad for books.

Things we weren’t allowed to use:

  • Scissors: If you’ve got a sharp cutting edge, a straight edge, and a cutting board, you should use those instead. You get better, even cuts that way.
  • Rubber bands: If you really need to hold something together, cotton tape is best. Rubber bands can add variable amounts of tension that can fluctuate between not doing the job and harming the book, not to mention you could get popped in the eye with a dry rubber band that snaps or something like that.

The supply list for the class recommended that we all bring books in various states of disrepair (I mostly grabbed deacquisitioned Reading books off of the victim cart at the front of the room). For any task where we didn’t have a book with a specific injury, we made one. This was particularly difficult for some people in the room. I thought it was pretty cool.

We used knitting needles and glue to repair loose spine hinges, document tape and japanese tissue to repair tears and torn out pages, glue, microspatulas, and bulldog clips to repair “bunged-up” book corners (that’s official lingo, you know), and even buckram cloth to repair a spine. I kept all of my test subjects, and brought home my spine fix, a large print copy of Danielle Steele’s Message from Nam.

The class was lots of fun. I sew, and I’ve always been a creatively crafty gal, so there was very little learning curve for me as long as the steps made sense. I really liked that Gregor emphasized that you should use the book to measure things instead of using rulers, since the book really gave you all the information you needed. And he made us all feel like we could do it. I’m totally going to put together a mending kit of the basics for my home library, and make the purchase list for Reading of the bare-bones supplies.

Aside from the actual hands-on, Gregor share lot’s of other information. One note that might be of interest to reference purchasers is that while you may think that a hardcover book has a longer shelf life than a softcover book, they are both bound the same way, so the bindings have the same shelf life. From experience, I know that a hardcover reference book lives better on the shelf, since it does less of that weird bending and stands upright better, but at the same time, hardcover reference books can cost way more than their paperback counterparts, if they’re even available. His advice: buy the paperback, and send it to a rebindering for a hardcover. The rebindering will do what’s called a “double fan glue” on it, which makes the book more durable, then they’ll add a better hard cover to it than the publisher would. From what I can tell, it would only really work well if you had a bulk order, but it could be less expensive in the long run in terms of the initial purchase cost and the future repair costs. You know, when you’re not replacing them every few years anyway. Interesting advice.

The other bit he mentioned was a documentary called “SLOW FIRES: On the Preservation of the Human Record” by Terry Sanders and Freida Lee. I wasn’t entirely paying attention (I was trying to remove the excess glue from a spine tab without getting it all over the book), but he mentioned something about books “burning from the inside” due to high levels of sulphuric acid used in book making (or as a by-product of deterioration of materials, or something). I’ll be putting this movie on my request list.

If you can, take one of these classes, no matter where you work in the library. It’s nice to know how to make the simple fixes, and you might learn other random, interesting stuff.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

01st Dec 2005

“If you want something done - ask a busy blogger.”

A whole lot’s been going on at work, and with NaNoWriMo and the holidays to contend with, I’ve gone almost completely LibraryTechtonics AWOL. On one hand it makes me sad; I’ve got a pile of things to blog, and I haven’t had a moment to give them. On the other hand, I feel like different things in general life and at work (at Reading and for PLA) are falling into better place, so I think balance will return soon. If I can just keep from getting sick every time I go away from home, it would be much easier. (Both the husband and I came back from Thanksgiving with a bug. Hurray. Honest. I’m ecstatic.)

The title on this post was a line in an email from one of my fellow librarians at Reading. (Alas, while I’ve been super busy, I haven’t really been good about getting back on the blogging horse. The irony!) One of the many fabulous things that’s happened at work at Reading is that we’ve been able to get computers on the desks of all of the librarians. Yep, we each have our *own* computer. I opted out of the purchase, since I take my laptop to work everyday, and it seemed right by me to save the money on the extra computer.

The previous workroom setup was such that there were 3 shared computers running Windows 2000 (eewwww!) with horribly inefficient configurations, all sorts of infected with spyware and all sorts of other nonsense. I believe the funding came from the Foundation (hurray!) to acquire new computers for all of the reference librarians, the children’s librarian, and an extra computer for any employee in the library to use.

What I found most interesting about the entire transition was the necessary changes to the environment that needed to be made so that each desk could accomodate a computer, monitor, and keyboard. Reading Public Library as a building was an elementary school once upon a time, so the rooms are big with outlets distributed sparingling along the walls, and each librarian has a large, old-school wooden desk. Everyone was very accustomed to working with books and piles on their desks, and then moving to the computer area to work on computery stuff.

With the shift came a big purge. *Huge* purge. People found things they thought they’d thrown away, or gave to someone else, or belonged to the person who had the desk before them. Everyone had to make space on their desks for these computers, and shift things from desks to shelves and such. They were happy to do it, though the task itself was daunting. Our custodians really earned their keep in that week!

Running extenstions and wires to the center of the room was interesting (better wiring will be taken care of at a later date), but otherwise, the installs were pretty painless. All of the computers are connected to the networked laserjet printer. It’s like a real office. :)
I’ve always been playfully taunted by the gals at work about my desk. It’s always so… empty. Tidy small piles, file folders in a thing on top of my desk, everything else in folders, a few trinkets to make my space festive, and a big, empty space where my laptop goes when I come in. So often the gals have apologized (or openly *not* apologized :D) for using my desk when I’m not in, because it was the only spare, clean space around.

My past experience in offices has always included a computer on the desk. When a computer lives on your desk, you either have a balance of workspace, paperspace, and digital space, or a hodge podge of organization. In any case, in order for me to set up my laptop and work efficiently in the few hours I have at Reading every week, it’s got to be organized. Slowly, the other librarians are learning why and how I organize my space so sparingly now that they have the same issues to content with. It’s interesting.

In any case, when we planned the transition, my boss Lorraine and I discussed how to back up the data on the ancient machines (without the luxury of CD writeable drives). The end result was to place everything in the My Documents folder on each machine, and then move those folders to one of the new machines (Rachel volunteered). However, we planned all this before I went to Monterey, and when Kathy asked me for her photos on Monday, I’d completely forgotten what we did with them. I asked about it yesterday, and was able to pop everything on the spare CD-RW disk I keep in my desk (I need to order some for the library next week), and left it on Kathy’s desk, followed up by an email on how to use the Scanner and Camera Wizard on Windows XP to get the photos.

In another world, a 3-day turnaround is license for your supervisor to have a sit-down with you about your attentiveness to time-sensitive tasks. In the library, it’s lightning fast. I’m still getting used to the difference. I kinda like it better this way. :D
In any case, Ruth, our director, is having an architect friend of hers come in and evaluate the workroom space for renovations, to give us some ideas. We’re looking at the potential for new desks and workspaces, as well as renovated storage and better wiring. In the meantime, the librarians are having all sorts of fun setting up their new machines, and learning to really customize their digital workspace.

Corinne, our children’s librarian, opted to make Firefox her new default browser because she’d never used it before, and she wanted to try something new. I love the people I work with, so willing to try new stuff! She was entirely new to the concept of news feeds, but being an intrepid librarian on a new internet adventure, she decided to try setting them up, and I got to help her figure out how to add RSS feeds to her Firefox toolbar (something, truth be told, I was only a little familiar with).

Some of the next steps in the library technology upgrade plan include adding an internal file server. Due to a complication in the old systems management model, which relied entirely on a Windows Active Server running in the basement connected to specific machines, we can’t harvest that server for file fun until we finish reimaging the computers in the children’s room (the new computer images make them stand-alone configurations on a shared physical network, on a separate VLAN from the staff computers, but not dependent on a server for permissions controls and whatnot). Hopefully we’ll have the children’s room computers set before Christmas, and maybe a file server as a present for the new year.

Long catch up posts are exhausting to write. I can only imagine what they’re like to read. ;D

Action item: post more often. Check.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Bad Behavior has blocked 595 access attempts in the last 7 days.